Augh, what kind of artist am I?! Obviously one that hasn't seriously worked with color. I thought Orange and Green were complimentary, but I was wrong. x.x Timber was right in his discernment of the Orange and Blue schema (Note: Schema is not the right word. How many times am I going to have to proof this post? This is number 8). Too long with graphite has stunted my artistic growth. I must now expand into the realm of
IMAGINATION if I'm to become a better artist. :p
I don't get a day off this week. WTF?! :pout: I work 37 hours, though, which is good. I'm using CatchTheCaracal, now, on Twitter, but instead of posting
from him, I post from Kreoche
to him, as such:
@CatchTheCaracal
SEPTEMBER 13
Sun 0500-1330 #
M 1700-2100 check
T 0900-1300 #
W 2200-0630
R 0900-1300 #
F 1700-2100
SAT 1600-2100
So if ya follow me on Twitter, you'll see these once a week, unless I forget to send it. Which I do, often.
( Photo of Food: )I cooked a fish last night. I had a chunk of Mahi Mahi, which I fried up with oil and some blueberry/acai flavored vodka. I then set the pan to warm, while I moved the fish off of the pan. I then put half of a tortilla in the pan, and toasted that. I removed it when it was nice and crisp, put ranch dressing on it, then the fish in the center. I folded it and I ate it. It was one of the best things I've cooked. =]
I was reading through my blog, looking for the post on
Soylent Green, when I found this. It's fairly epic:
True Story - Bard Style (Oct. 28, 2008)I worked an opening checker shift... 0500-1330. Nev drove me in. Thanks, NEV! :D I got all the tasks I needed to finish done in the first half-hour, and there was a lot of time between orders, so I bought a copy of the Wall Street Journal to read. It was interesting. Sometime a few hours into my shift, one of the assistant managers walked up to me and said I could be written up for that. I said that I had bought the periodical; however, she explained that because I was doing something leisurely (reading) while on the clock, it could be considered "time theft". That's a load of crap. I had all my tasks done. It came down to doing one of two things between orders: doing something productive (reading the WSJ), or standing there, bored, playing with the pen chain. The obvious, practical answer has been ruled out by the stifling, impractical stupidity of management, in favor of an answer that obeys every asinine rule to a fault. It's pathetic.
- The article I was reading was called
Man vs God. It was supposed to be a debate between a renowned expert in science, and a renowned expert in theology. Richard Dawkins vs Karen Armstrong. I read Dawkin's points first; they were rather compelling. Next, I read Armstrong's. I've never heard of her before; I don't know of her related credibility, but I figure since she's been pitted against Dawkins, she knows her stuff. I was thoroughly disappointed. Instead a debate, like it promised, she pretty much agreed with what Dawkins said, except on one point: Dawkins said that Evolution leaves God with, at best, nothing to do (at worst, he doesn't exist). Armstrong countered that God (an entity that is the same between all religions) is a necessary
mythos for our emotions to fall back on, so we can cope with the inescapable suffering that we encounter in life.
I hardly see religion like that anymore, or, at least... first off, It's hard to see how she's able to merge all the gods of compassion, such as the gods of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc, into the same being. They aren't, despite the similarities. However, I suppose if you see all gods as mythos, then, yes, it's easy to do. Like the stories of Atlantis and Lost could be the same, I guess. I need to look into this. I want to find out which theologians actually believe that there's something spiritual, that is, above and beyond the physical world, that can operate separately from it and within it; and which theologians are more like psychologists, who try to explain the spiritual phenomenon as figments and evolutionary coping devices to compliment our emotions. As much as I enjoy science, I understand that spirituality is separate from the physical, yet deeply and intimately connected; much like a player is separate from the game he plays (such as The Sims), yet deeply and intimately connected. The Sims don't see this outside world at all. They act on a set of pre-written instructions, what to do based on variable conditions. We are much the same way, biologically, but in a much more complex manner.
Those are my 12 cents (inflation, you see, does that to a few pennies).
You guys know the drill: any tl;dr's get a virtually stabbing from me and my alt, Luigi.
I might have more to say on this, however.. I'm exhausted. and I'm hungry. Hunger usually always trumps sleep, though, so.. bacon, maybe? Bacon, potato, cheese in a tortilla. Breakfast burritos!